P: God
G: Reality
Assume there is no God. If there is no God, there can be no proof. If there is no proof, there can be no reality.
If there is no God, there can be no proof because you can’t prove anything without making claims. You can’t claim anything without making assumptions. Assumptions are not consistent with the nature of proof. Therefore, there can be no proof.
If there is no proof, there can be no reality. Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics both show that reality is defined by perception. Since perception is defined by belief and belief is defined by proof, there can’t be adequate reality. Also, there can be no inadequate reality because reality is an absolute concept.
Since there is reality, God must exist. If there is a God, then you can make claims without making assumptions, which means there can be proof, and therefore reality. (The definition of God is Inherent Truth. This is a good definition of God because if you prove something using an inherent Truth, all of reality is derived from that Truth, which means that the Truth is omnipotent.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
wait, i thought yuo said ther eis no reality! thats what you've been saying all year, stick to your story, please, other wise it's very very very difficult to argue apecific points.
oh, and this is bethany btw.
The no reality concept is the major part of my proof. However, since the given is reality, God must exist.
Post a Comment